Chain security
Who this is for: developers and node operators who want to know what "security" means on Lumia beyond "it's a blockchain": what enforces correct transaction ordering, what enforces correct execution, what backs claims made about off-chain assets, and what has been independently reviewed.
Chain security on Lumia spans four distinct concerns. They fail independently: a valid proof doesn't make an oracle feed honest, and an audit engagement doesn't retroactively cover architecture built after it ran.
These four fail independently. A valid proof does not make an oracle feed honest, and an audit does not cover architecture built after it ran.
Last updated
Was this helpful?