Retired testnet 1952959480
Who this is for: developers or operators who find chain ID 1952959480 in an old tutorial, config file, or the current /build/identity/on-chain-kyc-integration page, and need to know it is not the live testnet.
Chain ID 1952959480 is a retired network. Its RPC (https://testnet-rpc.lumia.org) and its explorer (https://testnet-explorer.lumia.org) are both dead, connection-refused. It is not Beam. Beam (chain ID 2030232745) is the live Lumia testnet. Do not use 1952959480 for anything, and do not treat it as an alternate name for Beam.
The plain statement
1952959480 is not Lumia Beam. It is a separate, older network that docs.lumia.org's own /build/identity/on-chain-kyc-integration page still labels, verbatim, "Lumia Testnet." That name collides with today's Beam testnet, and that collision is the source of most of the confusion around it. Older docs and tutorials that call 1952959480 "the testnet" or imply it is Beam are wrong; never relabel it as Beam.
Chain ID
1952959480
Labeled as
"Lumia Testnet" verbatim on docs.lumia.org/build/on-chain-kyc
RPC (HTTPS)
https://testnet-rpc.lumia.org is dead: no HTTP response, connection failure.
Explorer
https://testnet-explorer.lumia.org is dead: no HTTP response, connection failure.
What to use instead
Use Beam, the live Lumia testnet:
Chain ID
2030232745 (hex 0x7902e4a9)
RPC
https://beam-rpc.lumia.org
Explorer
https://beam-explorer.lumia.org/
Faucet
https://beam-faucet.lumia.org/
Full table with citations: /reference/networks. Faucet detail: /reference/faucet.
Where this ID still shows up
docs.lumia.org/build/identity/on-chain-kyc-integrationuses1952959480in its KYC verifier request example. The corrected version of that guide lives at/build/identity/on-chain-kyc-integrationin this tree and should use994873017(mainnet) or2030232745(Beam) instead. See/reference/rest-apis/kyc-verifier-api.
Last updated
Was this helpful?