Token standards for RWA
Who this is for: issuers and developers choosing how to represent an asset on-chain. This page describes standards used broadly across the RWA and DeFi space. Lumia is a general-purpose EVM chain, so any of them can be deployed on it.
Core representation standards
Because Lumia is EVM-compatible, contracts implementing the standard interfaces below run the same way they would on any EVM chain. That is a property of EVM compatibility, not a Lumia-specific RWA product.
ERC-20
Fungible
Fund shares, a pool of receivables, or any asset best represented as divisible units
ERC-721
Non-fungible
A single unique asset: one property, one serialized note
ERC-1155
Semi-fungible, multi-token
Several distinct asset classes or batches in one contract, for example serialized notes with shared logic
See Stage 1: Issue for how this choice fits into defining the asset, and EVM differences on Lumia for how Lumia's EVM environment differs from mainnet Ethereum at the implementation level.
Vault standards
Yield-bearing or pooled positions are sometimes represented with a vault standard layered on top of a base token: ERC-4626 (tokenized vaults with synchronous deposit/withdraw) is the established pattern; ERC-7540 (asynchronous vaults, for positions that can't settle instantly) is a newer extension used where redemption isn't immediate.
Transfer-restricted standards
Some RWA issuers use a dedicated permissioned-token standard (for example, ERC-1400's partitioned-transfer model or ERC-3643's identity-registry model) instead of layering restriction logic onto a plain ERC-20. Lumia does not mandate a standard: the permission gate is the issuer's to design, as described in Permissionless base, permissioned app layer.
Last updated
Was this helpful?